County Criminal Court: CRIMINAL LAW – Sentencing
– The trial court erred in imposing discretionary fees without informing
Appellant she had a right to a hearing to contest the amount. Reversed and
remanded with directions. Walsh v. State,
No. CRC0806864CFAWS, (Fla. 6th Cir.App.Ct.
July 19, 2010).
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME
EXPIRES FOR REHEARING AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT
FOR THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
OF THE STATE OF
FLORIDA IN AND FOR PASCO COUNTY, FLORIDA
APPELLATE DIVISION
REGINA RENE WALSH,
Appellant,
v. UCN: 512008CF006864A000WS
Appeal
No. CRC08-06864CFAWS
Lower
No. 08-592MMAWS
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
__________________________________/
Appeal
from Pasco County Court
County
Judge Marc Salton
Lynda
B. Barack, Esq.
for Appellant
Office
of the State Attorney
for Appellee
ORDER AND OPINION
Appellant challenges the $300 Public
Defender attorney fee per Florida Statutes section 938.29 and a $40 Indigency fee per Florida Statutes section 27.52(1)(c). To preserve a challenge to the fees and costs,
a defendant must first file a motion to correct sentencing error pursuant to
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2). Appellant filed such a motion, which was
deemed denied as the trial court did not rule on the motion within sixty
days. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800(b)(2)(B); Watts v. State, 973 So. 2d
1271, 1272 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008); Webster v. State, 998 So. 2d 655, 656 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008). Therefore, Appellant has properly preserved
this issue for appellate review.
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure
3.720(d)(1) provides that trial courts are required to give notice at
sentencing of a defendant’s right to contest the amount of imposed attorney’s
fees. See Hayes v. State, 957 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 2d
DCA 2007). The record does not
indicate that the trial court informed Appellant at sentencing of his right to
a hearing to contest the fees. Since the
trial court erred by not informing Appellant of this right to contest or object
to the amount of the lien from these fees, this Court reverses and directs the
lower court to strike the fees. Del Valle v. State, 35 Fla. L. Weekly D 226 (Fla. 2d DCA
January 22, 2010); Hayes v. State, 957 So. 2d
97 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).
On remand, Appellant is given thirty
days from the issuance of the mandate to file a written objection to the amount
of the fees. McGee v. State, 963
So. 2d 931, 932 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007). If an objection is filed, the trial court shall
hold a hearing. Otherwise, if Appellant
does not timely object, the trial court shall reimpose
the lien without a hearing. See White v. State, 35 Fla. L.
Weekly D 183; Webster v. State, 998 So. 2d 655, 656
(Fla. 2d DCA 2008).
If Appellant files a timely objection,
the trial court shall make the necessary findings in determining what amount
was reasonable for the Public Defender fees at a hearing on the matter. The minimum fee of $40 is mandatory pursuant
§ 27.52(1)(c), Fla. Stat. (2008), and this Court cannot
find any grounds to contest that amount.
The maximum, however, shall be determined by whatever the trial court
finds reasonable by the evidence presented, even if it exceeds the original
amount imposed. Although Appellant has
the right to contest this Public Defender attorney fee, he should be aware that
doing so may result in a having to pay a higher amount. Therefore, it is
REVERSED
AND REMANDED.
DONE
AND ORDERED in Chambers, at New Port Richey, Pasco County, Florida this 19th
day of July 2010.
Original
order entered on July 19, 2010 by Circuit Judges Stanley R. Mills, W. Lowell
Bray, Jr., and Daniel D. Diskey.