McCrary v. State, No. CRC
03-73 APANO (
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
OF THE STATE OF
KEITH M. MCCRARY
Appellant,
Appeal No. CRC 03-00073 APANO
UCN522003AP000073XXXXCR
v.
STATE OF
Appellant.
____________________________/
Opinion filed _________________.
Appeal from a judgment and sentence
entered by the Pinellas County Court
County Judge Thomas Freeman
Joy Goodyear, Esq.
Assistant Public Defender
C. Marie King, Esq.
Assistant State Attorney
(J. Sullivan)
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Keith McCrary’s appeal from a judgment and sentence entered by the Pinellas County Court. After reviewing the parties’ supplemental briefs and the record, this Court affirms the judgment and sentence. The appellant’s counsel has adequately advocated the issues originally identified by this Court in this Anders brief appeal, but the State’s arguments cause this Court to conclude that there was no error in the trial court proceedings. Therefore, the judgment and sentence must be affirmed.
Only one issue merits discussion. The appellant makes a good argument that the trial court erred in requiring him to be present for the trial proceedings. He fails, however, to demonstrate that he was prejudiced in any way by his being present.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the judgment and sentence are affirmed.
DONE
AND ORDERED in Chambers at
____________________________
David A. Demers
Circuit Judge
____________________________
Robert J. Morris, Jr.
Circuit Judge
____________________________
Irene S. Sullivan
Circuit Judge
cc: State Attorney
Public Defender
Judge Freeman