March 18, 1994

(Opinion 94-06
(Using wife's travel agency


RE: Committee on Standards of Conduct Governing Judges
Your inquiry dated February 17, 1994

Dear Judge

You have requested an opinion from our Committee on the following matter:

Your wife is a travel agent and you wish to use her agency to arrange flights for your official travel. Any commission would be paid by the air carrier. All member of our Committee responding find no ethical problem for you as long as your wife's agency is able to obtain the lowest possible rates for your travel. Several members point out that this arrangement could subject you to public criticism even though there is no ethical violation.

The committee is expressly charged with rendering advisory opinions interpreting the application of the Code of Judicial Conduct to specific circumstances confronting or affecting a judge or judicial candidate. Its opinions are advisory to the inquiring party, to the Judicial Qualifications Commission and to the judiciary at large. Conduct that is consistent with an advisory opinion issued by the committee may be evidence of good faith on the part of the judge, but the Judicial Qualifications Commission is not bound by the interpretive opinions issued by the committee. Petition of the Committee on Standards of Conduct for Judges, 327 So.2d 5 (Fla.1976).

Very truly yours,


Nath C. Doughtie, Chairman
Committee on Standards of Conduct Governing Judges


cc: All Committee Members
Office of the Courts Administrator (name of judge deleted from this copy)

Participating members: Judges Doughtie, Farina , Goldstein, Green, Kahn, Patterson , Rushing, Taylor, Tolton and Edwards, Esq.