IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
OF THE STATE OF
CARI ANN TADLOCK
Appellant,
Appeal No. CRC 04-7 APANO
UCN522004AP000007XXXXCR
v.
STATE OF
Appellee.
__________________________/
Opinion filed _________________.
Appeal from judgment and sentence
entered by the Pinellas County Court
County Judge Karl Grube
Steven Loewenthal, Esq.
Attorney for appellant
Erin Wolfe, Esq.
Assistant State Attorney
ORDER AND OPINION
THIS
MATTER is before the Court on Cari Tadlock’s appeal from a judgment and
sentence entered by the Pinellas County Court. There is no transcript of the
proceedings in the trial court because the temporary electronic recording
system that was in use at the time was not properly engaged. Although this
Court relinquished jurisdiction and gave the parties ample time to reconstruct
the record, the parties have been unable to provide a record. The record in
this case is important because the appellant claims that the evidence was
insufficient to support her conviction. The remedy in this criminal case is a
new trial. See Hagan v. State, 853 So.2d 595 (
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the judgment and sentence are reversed, and this matter is remanded to the trial court for a new trial.
DONE
AND ORDERED in Chambers at
_________________________
Nancy Moate Ley
Circuit Judge
__________________________
R. Timothy Peters
Circuit Judge
___________________________
John A. Schaefer
Circuit Judge
cc: State Attorney
Steven Loewehthal, Esq.
Judge Karl Grube