County Criminal Court: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – Dismissal – Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.190(d) provides that a motion to dismiss filed pursuant to 3.190 c (4), shall be denied upon the filing by the state of a traverse which denies material facts- state did not deny material facts- Judgment affirmed -State v. Watkins, No. 03-0425CFAES(Fla. 6th App. Ct. January 18, 2005).
IN
THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
OF
THE STATE OF
APPELLATE
DIVISION
STATE OF
Appellant, Case No: 03-0425CFAES
v.
JOSEPH WILLIAM WATKINS,
Appellee,
___________________________/
Appeal from `
County Judge Debra Roberts
Michael Harris, Esq.
Attorney for Appellant
Mark A. Goettel, P.A.
Attorney for Appellee
ORDER
AND OPINION
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the State of
The appellee was
charged by information with discharging a firearm in public.[1]
The appellee filed a motion to dismiss, in which he attached an affidavit and a
diagram. Appellee alleged that he fired
a single shot in the ground more than 250 feet away from the road, he submitted
the diagram to show that the shot was fired in the area of a mobile home, a
metal building, and a barn. Appellee further alleged
that the shot was fired from a shotgun which was seized by the Pasco County
Sheriff's Office ("PCSO") and that the shotgun pellets did not
deflect from the ground. The affidavit of
appellee also acknowledges that two "alleged victims" were in the
area on the roadway collecting cans and that they stated they heard the
gunshot. The state filed a traverse in which it denied the shot was fired from
a shotgun which was seized by the PSCO and that the shotgun pellets did not
deflect from the ground. The state added
the following facts: once the shot was
heard the defendant was seen running toward the victims in a threatening manner
carrying the rifle and aiming the rifle at the victims.
The
trial court granted the motion to dismiss finding that the denials and added
facts do not dispute the defendant's material allegations nor meet the minimum
requirements of a prima facie case of discharging a firearm in public. This Court agrees. Specifically, Florida Statute 790.15 provides that ". .
. any person who knowingly discharges a firearm in any public place or on the
right of way of any paved public road, highway, or street or whosoever
knowingly discharges any firearm over the right of way of any paved public
road, highway, or street or over any occupied premises is guilty of a misdemeanor
of the first degree . . .". Therefore,
it is irrelevant whether or not the shotgun pellets went into the ground. Accordingly, the traverse denies no material
facts. See
IT IS THEREFORE
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at New Port Richey,
________________________
Primary Appellate Judge
____________________
Daniel D. Diskey
Circuit Judge
______________________
Circuit Judge
Copies furnished to:
Office of the State Attorney
Office of the Public Defender
[1] ". . . any person who knowingly discharges a firearm in any public place or on the right of way of any paved public road, highway, or street or whosoever knowingly discharges any firearm over the right of way of any paved public road, highway, or street or over any occupied premises is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree . . ." Fla. Stat. 790.15. Public place is defined in Florida Standard Jury Instruction (criminal) 10.6 as "any place intended or designed to be frequented or resorted to by the public."