IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 2006-017 PA/PI-CIR
OF PROTECTED HEALTH INFOR
The federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPPA), Pub. L. No. 104-191, 110 Stat. 1936 (codified as amended in scattered sections of 18, 26, 29 and 42 U.S.C.) authorizes an entity covered by federal regulations to disclose protected health information in response to a subpoena, discovery requests, or other lawful process under certain circumstances see 45 C.F.R. parts 160-164; and
A qualified protective order is a court order or stipulation by the parties to litigation that prohibits the parties from using or disclosing protected health information for any purpose other than the litigation and requires the information to be returned or destroyed at the conclusion of the litigation; and
The many requests the Court receives for such orders make it desirable to have a form qualified protective order and order to disclose protective health information available to the litigants and the Bar and it is desirable to update the existing form order; it is therefore
1. The form HIPPA Qualified Protective Order and Order to Disclose Protected Health Information, attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” is made available for use in the Sixth Judicial Circuit. Any deviation from this form should be brought to the court’s attention by the party seeking the order.
2. This administrative order does not limit the discretion of the trial judge to enter other appropriate orders in matters before the Court.
3. Where a party who obtains protected health information from a covered entity by subpoena, other discovery, or in response to a qualified protective order, and the party files such information with the Court, the party shall identify such information to the Clerk of the Circuit Court for sealing. A separate order sealing the records is not required. Discovery shall only be filed with the Court in accordance with the Florida Rules of Procedure.
4. Any party who obtains protected health information from a covered entity where such information is admitted into evidence shall identify such information to the Court and the Clerk of the Circuit Court for a determination by the Court at that time whether the evidence will be sealed.
5. The Clerk of the Circuit Court shall retain protected health information identified by the parties in the court file or received into evidence by the Court in accordance with Rule of Judicial Administration 2.051 and shall destroy such records in accordance with Rule of Judicial Administration 2.075 and applicable federal regulations.
Administrative Order 2003-014 PA/PI-CIR is hereby rescinded in its entirety.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at
David A. Demers, Chief Judge
cc: All Judges
The Honorable Robert Dillinger, Public Defender
Gay Inskeep, Trial Courts Administrator
Betty Henderson, Assistant Court Services Director, Pasco County Clerk’s Office
All Hearing Officers and General Magistrates
Rice, Senior Deputy Courts Administrator,
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
Plaintiff(s), CASE NO
ORDER ON DEFENDANT(S)’ MOTION FOR A HIPAA
QUALIFIED PROTECTIVE ORDER AND ORDER TO DISCLOSE PROTECTED HEALTH INFORMATION
This matter is before the Court on the motion of Defendant(s),
_________________________, for a Qualified Protective Order and Order to
Disclose Protected Health Information pursuant to the federal Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), Pub
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
1. Defendant(s)’ motion is GRANTED.
Qualified Protective Order
2. In accordance with and as defined by the regulations promulgated under HIPAA, specifically 45 C.F.R. section 164.512(e)(1)(ii)(B) and (v), the Court hereby enters a HIPAA Qualified Protective Order (QPO). Pursuant to this QPO, all parties to this lawsuit are:
a) prohibited from using or disclosing protected heath information (PHI) for any purpose other than the litigation of the above-styled lawsuit; and
b) required to destroy all copies of the PHI or to return them to the disclosing entity at the conclusion of the above-styled lawsuit.
3. For purposes of this QPO, “conclusion” is understood to include the time for any records retention requirement and statute of limitations applicable to a party or a party’s counsel. “Litigation” is understood to include all appellate proceedings or the expiration of time to commence such appellate proceedings without appeal.
4. Based upon this QPO and commencing immediately from the date of this QPO, all persons, including but not limited to physicians and other medical providers,
comply with any and all subpoenas for records without deposition pursuant to
Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1
authorized and ordered to use or disclose PHI in response to said subpoenas
Authorization and Order to Disclose PHI in the Course
of Discovery and Judicial Proceedings (Order to Disclose)
5. Additionally, pursuant to 45 C.F.R. section 164.512(e)(1)(i) and for purposes of HIPAA compliance, and without waiver of any right to the prepayment of costs or any other appropriate objection or privilege that may be timely asserted, the attorneys, employees, agents, or designees of each party or each party’s legal counsel in this case, and all duly noticed persons, are expressly and specifically AUTHORIZED and ORDERED to:
a) respond to valid Interrogatories served pursuant to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure in the above-styled matter seeking PHI;
b) respond to valid Requests for Production served pursuant to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure in the above-styled matter seeking PHI;
c) respond to valid and timely Requests for Copies or Requests for Production from Non-Parties served pursuant to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure in the above-styled matter for production of documents and things without deposition concerning PHI; and
d) respond to each of a party’s own experts who request, either orally or in writing, PHI for the purposes of reviewing the above-styled matter in whole or in part, regardless of whether the expert is a consulting or trial expert or is considered retained for compensation or not retained,
by disclosing and providing such requested PHI.
6. Additionally, pursuant to 45 C.F.R. section 164.512(e)(1)(i) and for purposes of HIPAA compliance, without waiver of any right to the prepayment of costs or any other appropriate objection or privilege that may be timely asserted, each deponent duly noticed for deposition in the above-styled litigation, including but not limited to a party, a fact witness, a records custodian, an expert, or a healthcare provider of any type, is expressly and specifically AUTHORIZED and ORDERED to use or to disclose to the attorneys, agents, employees, and designees of each party or each party’s legal counsel in this case the PHI of a party that is responsive to deposition questions or a valid subpoena duces tecum at such duly-noticed deposition in the above-styled litigation.
7. Additionally, pursuant to 45 C.F.R. section 164.512(e)(1)(i) and for purposes of HIPAA compliance, without waiver of any right to the prepayment of costs or any other appropriate objection or privilege that may be timely asserted, all witnesses duly appearing at, or subpoenaed for, any judicial proceeding related to this litigation, including but not limited to trial, are specifically and expressly AUTHORIZED and ORDERED to use and disclose the PHI of a party in any form at such judicial proceeding.
8. In compliance with both HIPAA and any applicable state law not preempted by HIPAA, the authorizations and orders set forth in paragraphs 5, 6, and 7 of this Order to Disclose expressly include PHI concerning psychological and mental heath records, disability status and records, substance abuse and treatment history, and HIV status, as well as records concerning other sexually transmitted diseases if so requested.
9. The commands of the Court in paragraphs 5, 6 and 7 of this Order to Disclose are a separate authorization for use or disclosure of PHI in addition to, and potentially inclusive of, the use and disclosures authorized under paragraph 2 of the QPI.
10. Violation of paragraphs 5, 6, or 7 of the Order to Disclose may subject the non-compliant party, or that party’s counsel, to sanctions, including but not limited to the costs and attorney’s fees attributable to such non-compliance, the striking of evidence or testimony, or the striking of the party’s claims or defenses.
11. Pursuant to 45 C.F.R. section 164.512(e)(1)(i) and for purposes of HIPAA compliance, without waiver of any right to the prepayment of costs or any other appropriate objection or privilege that may be timely asserted, any person or entity authorized or ordered above to use or disclose PHI is expressly and specifically AUTHORIZED and ORDERED to do so with, to, or before any court reporter service, videographer service, translation service, photocopy service, document management service, records management service, graphics service, or other such litigation service, designated by a party or a party’s legal counsel in this case. The protections and requirements of paragraph 2 of the QPI apply to such service providers. Each party or the party’s legal counsel is charged with obtaining advance consent of such service to comply with this paragraph. Upon such consent, the service provider will be deemed to have voluntarily submitted to this Court’s jurisdiction during the pendency of the above-styled matter for purposes of enforcement of this paragraph, including but not limited to the imposition of such sanctions as may be appropriate for any non-compliance.
12. Except for business associate agreements (as defined by HIPAA) entered into by a party or a party’s legal counsel for purposes of satisfying the requirements of paragraph 11 of the Order to Disclose, the uses and disclosures of PHI authorized under the Order to Disclose are separate from, and not to be deemed subject to, any business associate agreement that has been or will be executed by any party, any party’s legal counsel, or any disclosing person or entity. No use or disclosure made pursuant to the Order to Disclose shall be deemed to require the execution of a business associate agreement (as defined by HIPAA). The intent of the Order to Disclose is that such business associate agreements, including any requirement for such agreements under the HIPAA regulations, should be construed as inapplicable to uses and disclosures under this Order and as limited only to uses and disclosures of PHI outside of the Order to Disclose.
16. A copy of this QPI and Order to Disclose
shall be valid as an original
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, at